To come back to the example of the square my friend,
we know that the diagonal of any supposedly perfect square is the root of 2 and this root represents a number that
although finite in the figurative sense
is intellectually in commensurable when
the imagined number has no end
because we want to see in it
in our mind
a finite consequence
rather than accepting it as
a function
Now the root of 2 is this fact:
that any number
multiplied by itself will form
a square
and
if the side of the square
has a name N
and side length N
the diagonal will be N[root 2]
We can calculate this diagonal
and
we can attribute this diagonal
to any value
dictated by the side length N
and the naming in other names
will not modify
the function expressed by [root 2]
this notion of [2] is
the essence of the notion
as an ion
of
THE SQUARE
THE SQUAREone could never trace or draw a
perfect square
and absolute
square
it does not exist and
it IS
that is
IT is
one
with the
UNI QUE
of
THE UNI VERSE
THE SQUARE
we can respond to this
by saying that this absolute square
can only be assumed to exist
We can say what we like
this makes nothing the truth
We can calculate with squares
as if they existed
without being preoccupied
about the reality of the idea
and we will have there by
neglected what this Function
can and does reveal
the Law the governs all Genesis
because nothing can exist without having first become
without starting from
a cause that
necessarily
obeys the scission ion that makes
One of the number 2
for this profound reason
pharaonic arithmeticians
make and use
The Function of the [2]
The instrument of the definition ion
of all
becoming
The infinite tail in the decimal representation
allows for the infinite variety of
variety observable in all species at
all levels of life including water
If the construction ion
is executed using the root as the
foundation
the approximation ion
is what is expected and
the perfection ion is what puts the
group of Θ based ideas into
perspective from all angles
a Hypothesis, the imaginary
construction for the convenience of the argument
is that the function of and so the thing itself as
[2] square root of two
is not rational
and there fore nonsense or trivial at best
as a tool to comprehend reality
Nothing could be more distant from the center
where all truths participate
in the one equally
Has not our science come to perceive that the atomic substance of bodies is moving? That all bodies, beginning with the most elementary ones, are subject to modifications, to aging to oxidation and that they are therefore living?
On the day --which is approaching--when we will have to revise our "philosophical thinking" in light of our
newly acquired convictions, we shall most likely come nearer to the guiding knowledge of our pharaonic ancestors.
'Number resides within all that is known.
Without number, it would be impossible to reason or to know'
writes the Pythagorean philosopher Philolaus
"They Say", the Platonist philosopher Proculus assures "that the people who first divulged the secret of the irrational numbers perished in a shipwreck to the last man, because the inexpressible, the formless, must be kept absolutely secret; those who divulged it and depicted this image of life perished instantaneously and must be tossed about by the waves for all eternity
Can there be a better example of the error of "Scholarly thought"?
asks R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz in The Temple of Man
Comments
Post a Comment