N is e qual to what

 There are a number of ways this could be said...in fact Noam Chomsky wrote a book and formalized a different set of ideas around the original blueprint supplied by Plato in the Diagonal explanation of everything...aka that Sophisticated lady of language learning the way language was designed and built according to the arithmetic of nature where the evens and the odds define the complete and incomplete sets of sets the prime set of sets defines the edges of expansion and contraction needed to make the room needed for the redox redux

Regular grammars[edit]

In regular grammars, the left hand side is again only a single nonterminal symbol, but now the right-hand side is also restricted. The right side may be the empty string, or a single terminal symbol, or a single terminal symbol followed by a nonterminal symbol, but nothing else. (Sometimes a broader definition is used: one can allow longer strings of terminals or single nonterminals without anything else, making languages easier to denote while still defining the same class of languages.)

The language  defined above is not regular, but the language  (at least 1  followed by at least 1 , where the numbers may be different) is, as it can be defined by the grammar  with  the start symbol, and the following production rules:

As each Perfectly balanced breath is \}reathed skyward by every natural phenomenon the breathing process that solidifies said psylo of siloed phylomorphia into the tirfecta of three three prime groups from which all other subgroups subgroup along the diagonal spiral nome de bent geometry the tri gnome of tri gnome ometry...whence the bigger picture as the redox redux fills itself as itsself empties the other end of the other end of the equation where lightening lets loose every now and then to signal the tank is full for a few...everyone know Then when a friend can get back to doing whatever came before the after beginning that last little barn dance burned down a few nitrogen nodes waiting for nebulization as the juice joins in the st vitus dance for the day and the night at the races...shyster flywheel shyster angular momentum encouraging the conservation of the juice joining the jam joyfully to the beat that smells like heat...

given the face of the fact day and night are as ambiguous as all other items on the big list wrapped angularly around the big picture...ovoid wide wisdom warbles west is the end where east ends going the other direction chasing west eastwardly endless ever halved to the and line of dotted dreams directionless diagonals darting dirges diverge due north converting dot disk dimes dusted down drawn dagger droll ballon buffoon blade bent converging divergent until convergent as ants go and come to and from holes in the ground to ground in the holes whence direction directs dirty water directly drainwhorld duoWnpWard 

Coriolis force

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
In the inertial frame of reference (upper part of the picture), the black ball moves in a straight line. However, the observer (red dot) who is standing in the rotating/non-inertial frame of reference (lower part of the picture) sees the object as following a curved path due to the Coriolis and centrifugal forces present in this frame.

In physics, the Coriolis force is an inertial or fictitious force[1] that acts on objects in motion within a frame of reference that rotates with respect to an inertial frame. In a reference frame with clockwise rotation, the force acts to the left of the motion of the object. In one with anticlockwise (or counterclockwise) rotation, the force acts to the right. Deflection of an object due to the Coriolis force is called the Coriolis effect. Though recognized previously by others, the mathematical expression for the Coriolis force appeared in an 1835 paper by French scientist Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis, in connection with the theory of water wheels.[2] Early in the 20th century, the term Coriolis force began to be used in connection with meteorology.

Newton's laws of motion describe the motion of an object in an inertial (non-accelerating) frame of reference. When Newton's laws are transformed to a rotating frame of reference, the Coriolis and centrifugal accelerations appear. When applied to objects with masses, the respective forces are proportional to their masses. The magnitude of the Coriolis force is proportional to the rotation rate and that of the centrifugal force is proportional to the square of the rotation rate. The Coriolis force acts in a direction perpendicular to two quantities: the angular velocity of the rotating frame relative to the inertial frame and the velocity of the body relative to the rotating frame, and its magnitude is proportional to the object's speed in the rotating frame (more precisely, to the component of its velocity that is perpendicular to the axis of rotation). The centrifugal force acts outwards in the radial direction and is proportional to the distance of the body from the axis of the rotating frame. These additional forces are termed inertial forces, fictitious forces, or pseudo forces.[3] By introducing these fictitious forces to a rotating frame of reference, Newton's laws of motion can be applied to the rotating system as though it were an inertial system; these forces are correction factors that are not required in a non-rotating system.[4]

In popular (non-technical) usage of the term "Coriolis effect", the rotating reference frame implied is almost always the Earth. Because the Earth spins, Earth-bound observers need to account for the Coriolis force to correctly analyze the motion of objects. The Earth completes one rotation for each day/night cycle, so for motions of everyday objects the Coriolis force is usually quite small compared with other forces; its effects generally become noticeable only for motions occurring over large distances and long periods of time, such as large-scale movement of air in the atmosphere or water in the ocean; or where high precision is important, such as long-range artillery or missile trajectories. Such motions are constrained by the surface of the Earth, so only the horizontal component of the Coriolis force is generally important. This force causes moving objects on the surface of the Earth to be deflected to the right (with respect to the direction of travel) in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere. The horizontal deflection effect is greater near the poles, since the effective rotation rate about a local vertical axis is largest there, and decreases to zero at the equator.[5] Rather than flowing directly from areas of high pressure to low pressure, as they would in a non-rotating system, winds and currents tend to flow to the right of this direction north of the equator (anticlockwise) and to the left of this direction south of it (clockwise). This effect is responsible for the rotation and thus formation of cyclones (see Coriolis effects in meteorology).

For an intuitive explanation of the origin of the Coriolis force, consider an object, constrained to follow the Earth's surface and moving northward in the Northern Hemisphere. Viewed from outer space, the object does not appear to go due north, but has an eastward motion (it rotates around toward the right along with the surface of the Earth). The further north it travels, the smaller the "radius of its parallel (latitude)" (the minimum distance from the surface point to the axis of rotation, which is in a plane orthogonal to the axis), and so the slower the eastward motion of its surface. As the object moves north, to higher latitudes, it has a tendency to maintain the eastward speed it started with (rather than slowing down to match the reduced eastward speed of local objects on the Earth's surface), so it veers east (i.e. to the right of its initial motion).[6][7]

Though not obvious from this example, which considers northward motion, the horizontal deflection occurs equally for objects moving eastward or westward (or in any other direction).[8] However, the theory that the effect determines the rotation of draining water in a typical size household bathtub, sink or toilet has been repeatedly disproven by modern-day scientists; the force is negligibly small compared to the many other influences on the rotation.[9][10][11]



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Temple as Man

Uncertain certainty expanded

Spectroscopy in Theory aka Ψ Φ μθσιχ PSIPHI Musi~ch